NFT Smart Contract Development: ERC-721 vs ERC-1155
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Share
Build smarter NFTs: compare ERC-721 vs ERC-1155 gas costs, explore ERC-6551 Token Bound Accounts, and learn how EIP-7702 (Pectra 2025) simplifies onboarding.
Frequently Asked Questions
- ERC-1155 is generally easier and cheaper to bridge at scale because of its batching capabilities. However, ERC-721 is supported by nearly every bridge protocol due to its historical dominance in high-value collections.
- Regardless of using ERC-721 or ERC-1155, always implement EIP-2981. This is the standard for on-chain royalty signalling, ensuring that marketplaces can automatically reward creators across different platforms and Layer 2s.
- No. The standards have fundamentally different internal state storage and data structures. You would need to wrap your ERC-721 tokens into a new ERC-1155 contract, which incurs significant gas costs and complicates the user experience. Choose the correct standard before deployment.
- Yes, by using an ERC-6551 Token Bound Account. The ERC-1155 token ID can be assigned a smart account address, which then becomes the owner of any ERC-721 token sent to it, creating a nested asset relationship.
Don't Miss What's Next
Subscribe to newsletter
NFTs
Solidity
Smart Contracts
ERC-721
ERC-1155
ERC-6551
Ethereum Development
Get in Touch
Our team will get back to you within 24 hours.










